Listen
Watch
DownloadWhat is NIST Compliance?
NIST compliance refers to adherence to the cybersecurity standards and guidelines developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which are designed to help organizations manage and reduce cybersecurity risk.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology, or NIST, was founded in 1901 and was originally known as the National Bureau of Standards. NIST now operates under the U.S. Department of Commerce, and, as a federal agency, plays a critical role in setting national standards.
At its core, NIST compliance means adhering to the established guidelines and standards to ensure strong cybersecurity practices. These guidelines enable organizations to identify, manage, and mitigate cyber risks through continuous monitoring, vulnerability assessments, and the implementation of security controls to prevent, limit, or contain the impact of cybersecurity events.
NIST compliance involves implementing the controls, processes, and governance practices outlined in NIST publications. By following NIST standards, organizations can:
- Stay ahead of emerging cyber threats
- Streamline their compliance processes
- Reduce manual tasks when paired with automation tools
NIST compliance goes beyond checking boxes—it’s a strategic approach to strengthening cybersecurity, building stakeholder trust, and gaining a competitive edge.
This post breaks down what NIST compliance means in practice, why it matters across industries, how to navigate its core frameworks like CSF v2.0, and what it takes to stay compliant in a fast-changing threat landscape.
Whether you’re new to NIST or refining your compliance strategy, this guide will help you understand its core frameworks, apply them effectively, and align your cybersecurity efforts with evolving business and regulatory priorities.
- What are the core functions of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework?
- What’s the difference between NIST CSF v1.0 and v2.0?
- Why is NIST compliance important?
- What are the benefits of NIST compliance?
- Popular NIST frameworks and security standards to know
- How different industries use NIST frameworks and standards
- NIST in practice: Industry-specific challenges and goals at a glance
- How hard is it to become NIST compliant?
- How organizations can achieve and maintain NIST compliance
- Turning NIST strategy into action with Tanium
- NIST compliance FAQ
What are the core functions of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework?
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) is structured around six foundational pillars—Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover, and Govern—that guide organizations in managing cybersecurity risk and addressing multiple aspects of risk management.
These six functions form the backbone of the CSF, offering a structured approach to managing cybersecurity risk throughout its lifecycle:
- Identify
The Identify function lays the foundation for effective cybersecurity by helping organizations understand what they need to protect. This includes inventorying assets like hardware, software, data, systems, and third-party services, as well as understanding business context, regulatory requirements, and risk tolerance.
A strong Identify function results in a dynamic, up-to-date inventory and a clear understanding of organizational priorities—enabling smarter decisions across all other cybersecurity functions. - Protect
Once critical assets and risks are identified, the Protect function focuses on safeguarding them. This includes implementing access controls, encryption, endpoint protection, and secure configurations to prevent unauthorized modification and disclosure of sensitive data. It also emphasizes user awareness training and data security policies to reduce human error and insider threats.
The goal is to embed resilience into systems and processes, minimizing the impact of emerging threats. - Detect
The Detect function enables timely discovery of cybersecurity events. It involves continuous monitoring, threat detection tools, and anomaly identification to spot suspicious activity.
Effective detection ensures that incidents are identified early, allowing for quicker response and reduced damage. - Respond
The Respond function outlines actions to contain and mitigate the effects of a cybersecurity incident like data loss, system destruction, and service disruption. This includes incident response planning, communication protocols, forensic analysis, and coordinated mitigation efforts.
A well-executed response limits disruption and supports recovery efforts. - Recover
The Recover function focuses on restoring capabilities and services after a cybersecurity incident. It includes recovery planning, system restoration, and communication strategies to ensure transparency and trust.
The aim is to return to normal operations quickly while incorporating lessons learned to strengthen future resilience. - Govern
The Govern function establishes the strategic foundation for cybersecurity risk management. It defines roles, responsibilities, policies, and oversight mechanisms to ensure accountability and alignment with enterprise risk objectives.
Governance integrates cybersecurity into organizational decision-making and culture.
With the release of CSF v2.0, NIST not only expanded the framework scope but also introduced the sixth function—Govern—to reflect the growing importance of strategic oversight in cybersecurity. This addition marks more than just a structural change; it signals a shift in how cybersecurity is viewed across industries—from a technical function to a core element of enterprise risk management.
CSF 2.0 creates an impetus to align the cybersecurity risk management strategy, expectations and policies strategy with the broader goals of the organization. This realignment may require both a technical and cultural shift.1
Governance reinforces that cybersecurity is a continuous, organization-wide responsibility—not a siloed function.
To understand the impact of this update, it helps to compare CSF v2.0 with its earlier version.
What’s the difference between NIST CSF v1.0 and v2.0?
The original NIST CSF v1.0, released in 2014 and updated to v1.1 in 2018, introduced five core functions—Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover—to help organizations manage cybersecurity risk. In 2024, NIST released CSF v2.0, marking the most significant update to the framework to date.
One of the most visible changes is the addition of a sixth function: Govern.
This new function formalizes the strategic oversight already implied in the original framework and elevates governance to a first-class pillar of cybersecurity.
Governance activities are critical for incorporating cybersecurity into an organization’s broader enterprise risk management (ERM) strategy. Govern addresses an understanding of organizational context; the establishment of cybersecurity strategy and cybersecurity supply chain risk management; roles, responsibilities, and authorities; policy; and the oversight of cybersecurity strategy.2
But the differences go deeper than structure. CSF v2.0:
- Expands its scope beyond U.S. critical infrastructure to apply to organizations of all sizes, sectors, and geographies
- Integrates with other frameworks like the NIST Privacy Framework and NICE Workforce Framework, promoting interoperability and holistic risk management
- Introduces new subcategories that emphasize risk appetite, tolerance, and response options—encouraging organizations to tailor their cybersecurity strategies to their unique risk profiles
- Adds an “Improvement” category to support continuous feedback and evolution of cybersecurity practices
[Here’s a broader look at how IT compliance fits into your overall risk and security strategy]
Together, these changes reflect a shift in mindset: cybersecurity is no longer just a technical function—it’s a strategic, enterprise-wide discipline. CSF v2.0 encourages organizations to treat cybersecurity as a continuous, adaptive process that aligns with business goals, regulatory expectations, and stakeholder trust.
Why is NIST compliance important?
NIST compliance plays a critical role in building resilient, risk-aware cybersecurity programs. It provides a shared language and structure that helps security, IT, and compliance teams align around common goals—and respond to threats with greater clarity and coordination.
- Proven expertise
NIST frameworks are built on decades of cybersecurity research and real-world experience. They distill the collective knowledge of thousands of experts into actionable guidance that organizations can trust. NIST frameworks are often referenced in cybersecurity legislation and regulatory guidance. - Flexible by design
Originally developed for U.S. federal agencies, NIST standards now serve as a flexible foundation for cybersecurity programs across industries and geographies. Their modular structure makes them adaptable to organizations of all sizes and maturity levels. - Operational clarity
NIST frameworks translate complex cybersecurity requirements into clear, actionable steps. This helps teams align priorities, reduce duplication, and implement controls more efficiently—laying the groundwork for continuous improvement. - Built-in alignment
NIST frameworks don’t just clarify processes—they unify cybersecurity, IT, and compliance strategies under a shared vision. This cohesion builds internal confidence, reduces ambiguity in decision-making, and helps teams act with greater purpose and precision.
Understanding why NIST matters is just the beginning. Let’s look at the tangible benefits organizations gain by putting its principles into practice.
What are the benefits of NIST compliance?
NIST compliance delivers more than regulatory alignment. It offers a strategic foundation and proven best practices for managing cybersecurity risk in a structured, scalable, and repeatable manner.
By following NIST’s well-defined frameworks, organizations can strengthen their security posture, streamline compliance efforts, and respond more effectively to evolving threats. These frameworks help organizations proactively defend against cyberattacks, data breaches, and operational disruptions.
NIST compliance also builds trust. It signals to customers, partners, and regulators that your organization takes cybersecurity seriously and has invested in proven, industry-recognized practices to protect sensitive data and systems.
Ultimately, organizations—especially those in regulated or high-risk industries—often find that aligning with NIST frameworks helps reduce risk exposure, avoid costly incidents, and enhance reputation, ultimately supporting long-term business goals.
With the benefits in mind, let’s explore the key NIST frameworks that help organizations put these principles into action.
Popular NIST frameworks and security standards to know
NIST offers a suite of frameworks and standards that help organizations manage cybersecurity risk with clarity and consistency. These resources are widely adopted in regulated sectors—such as defense, healthcare, finance, and education—not only to meet compliance requirements but to strengthen security programs.
At a high level:
- Frameworks provide strategic guidance for managing cybersecurity and privacy risks.
- Standards offer detailed, prescriptive controls for implementing and assessing security practices.
Below are some of the most widely used NIST frameworks—followed by key standards—that together provide the strategic guidance and technical controls organizations need to build and maintain strong cybersecurity programs.
Key NIST frameworks
- Cybersecurity Framework is a foundational guide for managing and reducing cybersecurity risk. The CSF’s structure—built around six strategic cybersecurity pillars—offers organizations a flexible and widely adopted approach to managing risk.
- Risk Management Framework (RMF) integrates security, privacy, and supply chain risk management into the system development life cycle. It’s especially relevant for federal agencies and contractors managing sensitive systems.
- Privacy Framework is a voluntary tool that helps organizations identify and manage privacy risks while supporting innovation. It aligns with the CSF to promote integrated risk management.
- AI Risk Management Framework is designed to help organizations develop and deploy trustworthy AI systems. While still gaining adoption, it’s increasingly important for organizations working with machine learning and automation.
- NICE Workforce Framework for Cybersecurity establishes a common language for cybersecurity roles and skills. It’s a valuable resource for building, training, and managing a capable cybersecurity workforce.
These frameworks provide a top-down approach to cybersecurity strategy. For hands-on implementation, NIST also publishes detailed standards that define specific controls and assessment methods.
Common NIST security standards
While NIST frameworks offer strategic guidance, the real-world implementation of cybersecurity practices often depends on NIST’s detailed technical standards. These standards, published as Special Publications (SPs), define the specific controls, assessment methods, and security requirements that organizations use to implement their cybersecurity programs.
Below are some of the most widely adopted NIST standards, used by both government agencies and private-sector organizations to protect sensitive systems and data:
- SP 800-37: Risk Management Framework for Information Systems and Organizations outlines how to apply the RMF to federal systems, integrating security, privacy, and supply chain risk management into the system development life cycle.
- SP 800-53: Security and Privacy Controls for Information Systems and Organizations provides a comprehensive catalog of controls to protect the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of federal information systems.
- SP 800-53A: Assessing Security and Privacy Controls offers guidance for evaluating whether controls are implemented correctly, operating as intended, and producing the desired outcomes.
- SP 800-82: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security focuses on securing ICS environments, offering recommendations to protect critical infrastructure and reduce operational risk.
- SP 800-145: Guidelines on Security and Privacy in Public Cloud Computing addresses the unique risks of cloud environments and provides considerations for outsourcing data and infrastructure to public cloud providers.
- SP 800-161: Supply Chain Risk Management Practices helps organizations identify and mitigate risks in their technology supply chains to ensure the integrity and security of their systems.
- SP 800-171: Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) defines security requirements for nonfederal systems that handle CUI-especially relevant for federal contractors and subcontractors.
- SP 800-172: Enhanced Security Requirements for CUI builds on 800-171 with advanced controls to protect against sophisticated threats targeting sensitive federal data.
These standards provide the technical foundation for implementing NIST-aligned cybersecurity programs.
Next, let’s explore how different industries apply these standards to meet their unique security and compliance management needs.
How different industries use NIST frameworks and standards
Cybersecurity challenges vary widely across industries and fields—from protecting patient data in healthcare to securing industrial control systems in energy. NIST offers a flexible suite of frameworks and standards that organizations—especially those in regulated sectors—can tailor to their specific risk environments, regulatory requirements, and security priorities.
While the NIST CSF is widely adopted in the field of information technology, many sectors also rely on other NIST resources, such as the RMF, SP 800-series publications, and supply chain or privacy-specific standards.
Below are examples of how different sectors apply NIST guidance—often combining CSF with more specialized standards—to address their unique cybersecurity challenges.
Education
Educational institutions are increasingly adopting the NIST CSF to manage cybersecurity risks, but many also reference NIST SP 800-53 and Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) standards to secure sensitive student and staff data. These frameworks help address challenges such as protecting online learning platforms, complying with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), and managing access to cloud-based educational tools. Some universities also align with RMF principles when participating in federally funded research or handling CUI.
Energy, oil, and gas
The energy, oil, and gas sector faces high-stakes challenges, including securing ICS, managing supply chain vulnerabilities, and ensuring business continuity. In addition to the NIST CSF, organizations often implement the NIST RMF to structure risk assessments and control selection. FIPS standards are used to secure data in operational technology (OT) environments, and NIST SP 800-82 provides specific guidance for ICS cybersecurity. These frameworks support compliance with federal energy directives and enhance resilience against nation-state threats.
Federal, state, and local government
Government agencies at all levels rely on a suite of NIST frameworks to meet stringent cybersecurity mandates and protect critical infrastructure.
For example, federal agencies are required to follow standards such as the NIST CSF and RMF to manage risk and implement security controls across their environments.
State and local organizations, while not always mandated, are increasingly adopting these same frameworks to strengthen their security posture, align with federal partners, and qualify for funding or compliance programs like the State and Local Cybersecurity Grant Program—which encourages alignment with national cybersecurity priorities and frameworks.
Federal agencies and many contractors—including those in defense, aerospace, and critical infrastructure—must also comply with NIST-driven regulations such as FIPS, the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA), and, where applicable, the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC). These mandates reinforce NIST’s role in securing government data and infrastructure across a wide range of federally regulated sectors.
Several key federal cybersecurity regulations build on NIST standards to address evolving threats and sector-specific needs:
- Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS): Developed by NIST, these are mandatory for federal systems and contractors. They ensure consistent, secure practices—especially around encryption and system integrity.
- Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC): Designed for defense contractors, CMMC incorporates NIST SP 800-171 and SP 800-172 to protect Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and defend against advanced threats.
- Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA): This law requires federal agencies to follow NIST-developed standards and guidelines to maintain strong, risk-based security programs.
Together, these regulations reinforce that NIST isn’t just a best-practice framework—it’s the foundation of federal cybersecurity compliance.
Financial services
Financial institutions use the NIST CSF to manage cybersecurity risks, protect sensitive financial data, and comply with regulations like the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) and SOX. Many also incorporate FIPS standards for encryption and authentication and use the RMF to guide internal audits and risk assessments. These frameworks help institutions defend against fraud, data breaches, and systemic threats to financial stability.
Healthcare
The healthcare industry leverages the NIST CSF to protect electronic health records (EHRs) and manage risks across clinical and administrative systems. The NIST SP 800-66 mapping to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Security Rule requirements helps organizations implement appropriate safeguards. FIPS standards are often used to secure data at rest and in transit, while RMF principles guide risk-based decision-making in health IT environments.
Manufacturing
Manufacturers use the NIST CSF to secure intellectual property, ICS, and supply chains. Many also adopt the NIST RMF to formalize risk assessments and control implementation, especially when working with federal contracts. CMMC is increasingly relevant for manufacturers in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB), requiring adherence to NIST SP 800-171 and SP 800-172 to protect CUI.
Retail
Retailers apply the NIST CSF to protect customer data, secure e-commerce platforms, and comply with PCI DSS and data privacy laws. FIPS standards are used to ensure secure payment processing and data encryption. Some retailers also reference NIST SP 800-30 for risk assessments and SP 800-53 for control baselines, especially when handling large volumes of PII or operating internationally.
Technology
Technology companies use the NIST CSF to manage cybersecurity risks across software development, cloud infrastructure, and data services. Many also implement the RMF to guide secure system development lifecycles (SDLCs) and use FIPS standards to ensure cryptographic integrity. For companies working with federal clients, CMMC compliance is essential, requiring alignment with NIST SP 800-171 and SP 800-172.
NIST in practice: Industry-specific challenges and goals at a glance
Need a quicker way to see how NIST frameworks play out across industries? We’ve distilled the key takeaways into a table—so you can scan sector-specific challenges, goals, and the NIST standards that support them at a glance. Whether you’re comparing use cases or looking for inspiration, this snapshot makes it easy to see NIST in action.
| Industry | Key cybersecurity challenges | Primary goals | Relevant NIST standards and frameworks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Education | Securing online learning platforms, protecting personal data, complying with FERPA and COPPA | Manage risks, protect student/staff data, ensure regulatory compliance | NIST CSF, SP 800-53, FIPS, RMF |
| Energy, oil, and gas | Safeguarding ICS, managing supply chain risks, ensuring infrastructure resilience | Protect OT environments, enhance security posture, maintain business continuity | NIST CSF, RMF, SP 800-82, FIPS |
| Federal, state, and local government | Managing legacy systems, meeting strict regulations, protecting critical infrastructure | Safeguard sensitive systems, ensure robust security, support national security | NIST CSF, RMF, FIPS, SP 800-53, SP 800-171/172, CMMC, FISMA |
| Financial services | Protecting financial data, preventing fraud, meeting compliance requirements | Manage risks, defend against breaches, ensure data integrity and confidentiality | NIST CSF, RMF, FIPS, SP 800-53 |
| Healthcare | Protecting EHRs, securing medical devices, complying with HIPAA | Safeguard patient data, manage risks, maintain compliance | NIST CSF, SP 800-66, FIPS, RMF |
| Manufacturing | Securing ICS, protecting IP, managing supply chain risks | Protect critical assets, ensure operational integrity, manage cyber risks | NIST CSF, RMF, SP 800-171/172, CMMC |
| Retail | Securing payment data, protecting e-commerce platforms, complying with data protection laws | Protect customer data, manage platform risks, maintain compliance | NIST CSF, FIPS, SP 800-30, SP 800-53 |
| Technology | Securing proprietary data, managing software development risks, ensuring data protection compliance | Protect IP, manage development risks, maintain regulatory compliance | NIST CSF, RMF, FIPS, SP 800-171/172, CMMC |
We’ve seen how NIST frameworks deliver real value—strengthening security, streamlining compliance, and building trust across industries. But what does it actually take to put them into practice?
How hard is it to become NIST compliant?
NIST compliance isn’t easy—but it’s achievable. Organizations that succeed tend to treat it not as a one-time checklist, but as a continuous improvement journey. With the right visibility, automation, and executive buy-in, even resource-constrained teams can make meaningful progress.
Here are some of the most common challenges:
- Visibility: Many organizations lack full visibility into their IT assets—especially endpoints like laptops and servers. Without a complete inventory, applying NIST standards organization-wide is difficult.
- Complexity: NIST guidelines are comprehensive by design. While that’s a strength, it can overwhelm smaller teams or organizations without senior-level security staff.
- Resource allocation: Time, budget, and personnel are often stretched thin. Compliance efforts can compete with other priorities unless they’re tightly aligned with business goals.
- Evolving standards: NIST regularly updates its frameworks to reflect new threats. Staying current requires ongoing attention and adaptability.
- Integration: Aligning NIST standards with existing tools and workflows can be tricky—especially in environments with fragmented or legacy systems.
- Third-party risk: Ensuring that vendors and partners meet NIST standards is essential but difficult. It requires coordination, monitoring, and often automation to avoid gaps.
Despite the challenges, organizations that commit to NIST compliance often see measurable gains in risk posture, audit readiness, and cyber resilience—as highlighted in Gartner’s overview of the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, which emphasizes its role in aligning security with business goals and improving operational resilience.
So how do you move from intention to execution? The path to NIST compliance isn’t linear, but it is navigable. With the right approach, organizations can turn strategic frameworks into operational reality.
How organizations can achieve and maintain NIST compliance
Achieving and maintaining NIST compliance isn’t a one-time task—it’s an ongoing process that requires strategic planning, continuous monitoring, and alignment with evolving standards. Organizations must understand their compliance obligations under frameworks like NIST CSF and RMF.
To make this manageable, it helps to break the process into three key areas: understanding the frameworks, implementing core practices, and maintaining compliance over time.
- Apply the frameworks strategically
You’ve already seen how the NIST CSF, RMF, and SP 800-series standards provide the security foundation for managing risk. Now it’s about applying them in a way that fits your organization’s structure, risk profile, and regulatory environment.
Not every organization will use every framework or publication. However, the following resources are commonly referenced across industries and can be tailored to meet specific compliance needs:- Use the NIST CSF as a high-level roadmap.
- Leverage RMF to guide risk-based decision-making.
- Use SP 800-53 to define and document controls in a System Security Plan (SSP).
- Use SP 800-171 to track and remediate gaps through a Plan of Action & Milestones (POA&M).
- Implement core practices
You know the framework—now it’s about making it real: turning strategy into action across your organization.
Here’s how those principles help bridge the gap between high-level guidance and hands-on execution:- Identify and prioritize assets, risks, and regulatory requirements.
- Apply appropriate controls to protect systems and data.
- Monitor continuously for threats and anomalies.
- Respond to incidents with clear plans and communication protocols.
- Recover operations quickly and incorporate lessons learned.
- Govern the entire process with defined roles, policies, and oversight.
- Maintain compliance over time
Compliance isn’t static—it requires ongoing attention and adaptation.
These practices help ensure your organization stays aligned with NIST guidance as your environment evolves:- Conduct regular security audits to assess program effectiveness and identify gaps.
- Document risk assessments, control implementations, and remediation actions.
- Continuously monitor systems and configurations to adapt to new threats or changes in the environment.
While NIST provides the strategic foundation, putting it into practice—at scale and with confidence—requires visibility, control, and continuous monitoring. That’s where Tanium comes in.
🎥 See Tanium in action as it maps Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) to Common Platform Enumeration (CPE) data—aligning vulnerability insights with NIST and the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) to identify component-level risks like outdated libraries or embedded third-party code + live demo and real-world context.
With the Tanium platform, organizations can automate policy enforcement, streamline reporting, and maintain a real-time compliance posture that aligns with NIST’s emphasis on continuous improvement.
Turning NIST strategy into action with Tanium
While frameworks like NIST CSF provide the strategic blueprint, execution depends on having the right tools to operationalize that guidance. Tanium bridges this gap by delivering real-time visibility, control, and compliance across all endpoints. It empowers organizations to act on risk insights instantly—reducing dwell time, accelerating remediation, and ensuring continuous alignment with NIST standards and evolving regulatory expectations.
Tanium’s Risk & Compliance solution is purpose built to align with NIST guidelines and other regulatory frameworks. It enables security, operations, and risk teams to:
Maintain compliance with confidence
With Tanium, you can continuously monitor endpoint configurations and vulnerabilities to support compliance readiness and swiftly address any gaps through automated remediation. This proactive approach helps ensure your IT environment remains secure and audit ready.
Tanium also facilitates the generation of compliance reports and audit logs to support audit readiness—making it easier to demonstrate adherence to NIST standards and saving your team valuable time and effort.
Extend your capabilities with Tanium Autonomous Endpoint Management
By leveraging the Tanium platform—which delivers Tanium Autonomous Endpoint Management (AEM)—you can confidently navigate the complexities of NIST compliance and focus on what matters most: protecting your organization.
Tanium AEM represents a significant leap forward in how the Tanium platform delivers endpoint management. As the foundation of the platform, AEM uses real-time data and continuous analysis of changes across global, cloud-managed endpoints to make intelligent recommendations and automate changes safely and reliably.
Now, with the integration of AI capabilities, Tanium AEM assists teams like IT, security, and operations teams in triaging alerts and reducing false positives through AI-enhanced insights, with human oversight, to act on real-time threat intelligence with greater precision. These AI-driven enhancements not only accelerate response times but also free up your team to focus on what matters most—strategic initiatives instead of sifting through noise. This ensures operational health, reduces the risk of negative IT outcomes, and helps you stay secure and ready for what’s next.
With Tanium AEM at the core, your organization can move beyond reactive compliance and embrace a proactive, autonomous approach. This not only meets regulatory requirements like NIST but also drives long-term resilience and IT excellence.
NIST compliance FAQ
Still have questions? Here are some quick answers to common NIST compliance topics to help you stay informed and confident in your approach.
Is NIST compliance mandatory?
NIST compliance is mandatory for federal agencies and for contractors handling sensitive government data, such as CUI, when required by contract. For private-sector organizations, it’s often voluntary but strongly recommended—especially in regulated industries or when pursuing federal contracts.
What is the difference between NIST SP 800-53 and 800-171?
NIST SP 800-53 provides a broad catalog of security and privacy controls for federal information systems, while 800-171 focuses specifically on CUI in non-federal systems. Organizations working with federal agencies often need to comply with NIST SP 800-171, while agencies themselves follow 800-53.
What’s the difference between NIST and ISO?
While both NIST CSF and ISO/IEC 27001 provide frameworks for managing cybersecurity risk, they differ in scope and application. ISO 27001 is a certifiable international standard for establishing and maintaining an information security management system (ISMS). NIST CSF, on the other hand, is a voluntary framework developed in the U.S. to help organizations assess and improve their cybersecurity posture.
How often should NIST compliance be reviewed or updated?
NIST recommends continuous monitoring and periodic reassessment of controls, typically annually or whenever there are significant changes to systems, threats, or business operations. Staying current ensures that your security posture evolves with emerging risks.
What happens if an organization fails to comply with NIST standards?
Noncompliance can lead to loss of government contracts, reputational damage, and increased risk of data breaches. In some cases, it may also result in legal or financial penalties depending on the regulatory environment.
Ready to simplify NIST compliance? See how Tanium can help—schedule a personalized demo today to learn how our platform approach can help your organization stay secure and compliant.
Tanium Subscription Center
Get Tanium digests straight to your inbox, including the latest thought leadership, industry news and best practices for IT security and operations.
SUBSCRIBE NOW
